使用 Github:Codeg （开启多智能体协同的情况下）在 claude code 进行开发，在一个会话里使用 skill 和不使用 skill 的区别效果：

使用 skill 后任务完成会由 codex 自动 review ，有问题直接修复，解决了我以前手动来回倒腾的问题。这是 skill 内容（如果使用其它子智能体 review 的话，可以把 skill 里面的 codex 替换一下），可以直接在 skills 管理里面添加，欢迎大佬们使用反馈，或者创作分享：

name: sub-agent-review-loop description: Use when any task could modify code, tests, config, schemas, migrations, deps, build/deploy scripts, artifacts, or behavior before completion

Sub-Agent Review Loop

Overview

Use Codex as an independent reviewer after work that can modify artifacts or behavior. Loop until the latest result is production-ready.

Core principle: Work is not complete until Codex approves the latest fixed version as production-ready.

Required Loop

Finish the implementation and run the relevant local checks.
Call Codeg MCP delegate_to_agent with agent_type: "codex", absolute working_dir, and a self-contained task containing the request, changed files or diff/SHAs, checks run, and constraints.
Require this quality bar: production-ready; do not approve while in-scope correctness, security, reliability, data, API, UX, performance, test, or maintainability issues remain.
Use receiving-code-review: verify claims, fix valid feedback, and push back with evidence on invalid or out-of-scope feedback.
Run the relevant checks again after fixes.
Send the updated result back to Codex for re-review.
Repeat until Codex approves the latest version with no unresolved valid in-scope issues.

Do not use an ordinary in-session Task/general-purpose reviewer as a substitute.

If delegate_to_agent is missing, Codeg MCP is not injected/enabled, the call fails, or the Codex child session fails, tell the human and leave the task incomplete or blocked. Do not self-review instead.

Codeg MCP Call

{
  "agent_type": "codex",
  "working_dir": "<absolute current working directory>",
  "task": "<complete review prompt; child cannot see this conversation>"
}

Codex Review Prompt

Review these completed changes as Codex.

Quality bar: production-ready. Do not approve while in-scope correctness,
security, reliability, data, API, UX, performance, test, or maintainability
issues remain.

User request:
<request>

Changes to review:
<diff, changed files, or BASE_SHA..HEAD_SHA>

Verification already run:
<commands and results>

Return:
- Verdict: APPROVED or CHANGES_REQUESTED
- Critical / Important / Minor issues
- Required verification

For re-review, add:

Re-review the latest state after fixes against the same production-ready quality
bar. Do not approve unless the current version is ready to ship.

Quick Reference

Situation	Required action
Artifact/behavior-changing task is done	Call `delegate_to_agent` before final response
Codex finds valid issues	Fix, verify, send back to Codex
Feedback seems wrong	Verify, push back with evidence
Minor issues remain	Fix valid ones unless they expand scope or risk
Codex approves latest version	Final response may be sent after checks pass

Red Flags

Rationalizations:

"The change is tiny."
"The user is waiting."
"Tests already passed."
"I reviewed my own diff."
"Codex only found nits."
"I fixed the issue, so another review is unnecessary."
"I used a generic reviewer subagent instead of Codeg MCP."

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Fix
Reviewing the original diff after fixes	Ask Codex to review the latest state
Blindly applying feedback	Verify with codebase evidence first
Stopping after fixes	Re-dispatch Codex after changes
Treating tests as a replacement for review	Run tests and Codex review
Using an in-session reviewer	Use Codeg MCP `delegate_to_agent`

Completion Gate

Final response is allowed only after implementation and accepted fixes are done, relevant checks pass or limitations are stated, Codex approves the latest version, and no known valid production-readiness issue remains in scope.

agent

SKILL

Review

2 replies • 2026-05-27 19:00:05 +08:00