不要被打击到, 慢慢工作, 慢慢跳槽, 就会遇到各种各样的同事, 然后他们有的是阿里的, 有的是腾讯的. 有的是头条的....只要技术号还可以, 面试机会总是会有的. 只要第一次得到了机会, 比如去了大公司刷了一波光辉, 之后就会越来越轻松.

苹果更垃圾，对不对，题主，nfc 都是定向开发俩功能

@chiu 只能祝福
@Tecson 看完了谢谢，最后那个对策里面说别让收入超过你能能力，其实我没看懂，怎么看多拿点钱都是好的啊。大不了猪落在地上工资再低一点

对自己有信心，以后觉得还能去阿里的，就去拼多多，否则就去阿里刷存在感。
title 真的真的很重要。
清华北大加阿里，面试都是横着走。虽然干活可能没那么大差距

@frostnotfall 住的挺近的，要不要聊一聊，吐槽啥的也行

@14kscn 搞笑么，头条缺人缺的不行？真的是

@jadec0der 大佬就是大佬，一小段话就看懂了。不知道楼主要干啥，就不能看看书？

@warcraft1236 我只是对每一个错误都要处理这件事 非常赞同，而且一定要显示，不处理就是 bug，处理错了也是 bug

@warcraft1236 所以遇到问题, 你都不处理? 或者无脑包装一层往上抛?

@Licsber 感觉和环境真有关系，你确定一模一样？包括 time.sleep ？

涨这么点怎么去不值,最少 double

@xujiaja 你是对的, 我把最后那个 sleep 一个小时, 改成了 for{}, 就可以回收了. 谢谢

就一条 未来菠菜行业的底层随机数都会是区块链诞生的

公平的随机数，不怕倒闭的合约，不懂的人真敢瞎说

@petelin 巧合, 里面的内容和我的业务逻辑没关系...

@Licsber 我在 mac 上测试的, 好像是因为 thread 没有退出.
Sampling process 19768 for 3 seconds with 1 millisecond of run time between samples
Sampling completed, processing symbols...
Analysis of sampling ___go_build_add_go (pid 19768) every 1 millisecond
Process: ___go_build_add_go [19768]
Path: /private/var/folders/wd/vt73dmmj5y38hft8kg5l1wgm0000gq/T/___go_build_add_go
Load Address: 0x1000000
Identifier: ___go_build_add_go
Version: ???
Code Type: X86-64
Parent Process: goland [14064]

Date/Time: 2018-12-06 21:33:47.174 +0800
Launch Time: 2018-12-06 21:33:00.224 +0800
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.13.6 (17G3025)
Report Version: 7
Analysis Tool: /usr/bin/sample

Physical footprint: 1.2G
Physical footprint (peak): 1.2G
----

Call graph:
2580 Thread_15197711 DispatchQueue_1: com.apple.main-thread (serial)
+ 2580 runtime.asmcgocall (in ___go_build_add_go) + 112 [0x1050da0]
+ 2580 runtime.pthread_cond_timedwait_relative_np_trampoline (in ___go_build_add_go) + 20 [0x1053204]
+ 2580 _pthread_cond_wait (in libsystem_pthread.dylib) + 789 [0x7fff5779a5c2]
+ 2580 __psynch_cvwait (in libsystem_kernel.dylib) + 10 [0x7fff575d1a16]
2580 Thread_15197713
+ 2580 thread_start (in libsystem_pthread.dylib) + 13 [0x7fff57798bf9]
+ 2580 _pthread_start (in libsystem_pthread.dylib) + 377 [0x7fff5779950d]
+ 2580 runtime.mstart_stub (in ___go_build_add_go) + 46 [0x10530ce]
+ 2580 runtime.mstart (in ___go_build_add_go) + 102 [0x102b9d6]
+ 2580 runtime.mstart1 (in ___go_build_add_go) + 230 [0x102bad6]
+ 2580 runtime.sysmon (in ___go_build_add_go) + 371 [0x10330b3]
+ 2580 runtime.notetsleep (in ___go_build_add_go) + 105 [0x1009499]
+ 2580 runtime.notetsleep_internal (in ___go_build_add_go) + 269 [0x10092cd]
+ 2580 runtime.semasleep (in ___go_build_add_go) + 271 [0x1024e3f]
+ 2580 runtime.pthread_cond_timedwait_relative_np (in ___go_build_add_go) + 81 [0x1043301]
+ 2580 runtime.asmcgocall (in ___go_build_add_go) + 173 [0x1050ddd]
+ 2580 runtime.pthread_cond_timedwait_relative_np_trampoline (in ___go_build_add_go) + 20 [0x1053204]
+ 2580 _pthread_cond_wait (in libsystem_pthread.dylib) + 789 [0x7fff5779a5c2]
+ 2580 __psynch_cvwait (in libsystem_kernel.dylib) + 10 [0x7fff575d1a16]
2580 Thread_15197714
+ 2580 runtime.mcall (in ___go_build_add_go) + 91 [0x104f52b]
+ 2580 runtime.goexit0 (in ___go_build_add_go) + 498 [0x102f552]
+ 2580 runtime.schedule (in ___go_build_add_go) + 314 [0x102eb6a]
+ 2580 runtime.findrunnable (in ___go_build_add_go) + 1244 [0x102e05c]
+ 2580 runtime.stopm (in ___go_build_add_go) + 227 [0x102cee3]
+ 2580 runtime.notesleep (in ___go_build_add_go) + 227 [0x1009163]
+ 2580 runtime.semasleep (in ___go_build_add_go) + 133 [0x1024db5]
+ 2580 runtime.pthread_cond_wait (in ___go_build_add_go) + 81 [0x1043291]
+ 2580 runtime.asmcgocall (in ___go_build_add_go) + 173 [0x1050ddd]
+ 2580 runtime.pthread_cond_wait_trampoline (in ___go_build_add_go) + 16 [0x10531e0]
+ 2580 _pthread_cond_wait (in libsystem_pthread.dylib) + 732 [0x7fff5779a589]
+ 2580 __psynch_cvwait (in libsystem_kernel.dylib) + 10 [0x7fff575d1a16]
.... 一共重复了 10 个 thread. 我在研究一下

@Licsber 请问你用什么工具看内存的? 我对 htop 是不是有点误解...